Fissile nuclei like uranium 235 or plutonium 239 are extraordinarily concentrated stockpiles of energy, with one gram of these substances capable of liberating as much energy as a ton of petrol!
The nuclear fuel placed in the reactor core contains fissile isotopes, these nuclei that give off tremendous amounts of energy when they are split. The quality of the nuclear fuel available – in particular the abundance and the nature of the fissile atoms – is a determining factor in the design of the reactor and how it will be operated.
The most common nuclear fuels are those derived from uranium, as uranium 235 is the only readily fissile isotope in nature. Even though it makes up less than 0.7% of all the naturally-occurring uranium ore, it is always possible to enrich natural uranium: a process whereby the percentage of uranium 235 is increased. The long and complex techniques used to enrich raw uranium for civilian purposes have been developed in industry since the 1960’s
The fuel is inserted into the reactor in the form of uranium oxide (UO2) pellets, piled up in zirconium cans to be arranged in ‘pencil’-shaped rods, which are then assembled in bundles. The main advantage of using uranium oxide is that it can stand high temperatures more easily.
As the fuel produces its energy, the number of fissile nuclei gradually decreases (*). In order to keep the same power output, despite the loss of reactivity, a variety of compensating procedures can be used until, after about 3 or 4 years, the fuel has become too poor to be of any use. For this reason, about a third of the reactor fuel is replaced every year.
Within today reactors, fissile materials are introduced through solid fuels, such as the pellets of uranium oxides of PWR reactors. The option of introducing these fissile materials into a liquid medium, such as molten salts, is possible. The alternative was tested with convincing results in the 1960s in the US, at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. It is being considered now as one of the option of fourth-generation reactors. The use of liquid fuels would in principle offer advantages. For example, it would not be necessary to shut down the reactors to reload fuel, the production of long-lived waste such as minor actinides would be reduced, an in-line reprocessing could remove a large part of its radioactivity from the reactor core.
Acces to page in french