The “nuclear fuel cycle” includes all nuclear operations ranging from the mining of uranium ore to the reprocessing of spent fuel and the ultimate radioactive waste disposal.
It is indeed a true and closed cycle when nuclei of fissile uranium or plutonium still available when the spent fuel of a reactor is unloaded are recycled in a fresh charge of fuel after reprocessing. Without reprocessing, nuclei of uranium or plutonium go once through the whole process : the cycle is called open.
The central stage of the fuel cycle takes place during the two to three years when the nuclear fuel is burnt in a reactor to produce electricity. Anything that happens before belongs to what is called the cycle “front-end" cycle, and anything that happens after to the “back-end” of the cycle.
Less known and making rarely the headlines, the ' front-end' of the cycle begins with the extraction of the uranium ore which contains generally a very low percentage of uranium. After mining, the ore is converted into a chemical concentrate, known as 'yellow cake', which can then be transported over long distances. The extraction and purification of uranium generate mining residues rather important in volume which have to be dealt with, even though they are far less radioactive than the waste produced at the back-end of the cycle.
Before uranium can be enriched into the fissile isotope uranium 235, it must be converted into uranium hexafluoride, a gaseous compound. This is the stage of "conversion”. The next step is enrichment. This step, by far the most expensive and sensitive, is carried out in an isotopic separation plant. Enriched uranium is then used to make fuel assemblies which can then be loaded into the core of a nuclear reactor. The by-product of the enrichment phase is a considerable amount of depleted uranium which is stockpiled,
The "back-end" of the cycle
The main problem to be solved in the cycle back-end is 'what should be done with the radioactive substances produced by the reactors'?
The fuel is first placed in a storage pool for a period of five years or so, the time to let the most active fission products decrease or disappear. After those five years, a decision is taken as to whether to reprocess or not. If not, then the fuel must be stockpiled as it is. Research is currently being carried out as to the feasibility of a final disposal of spent fuel deep underground, Decisions are still to be taken about such disposals. Meanwhile, the waste stockpiled above ground around the power plants accumulate.
If a reprocessing is decided, the spent fuel is transported to a reprocessing plant where it is stored again a few more years in a local pool. Reprocessing involves separating what can be recycled - uranium and plutonium – from what can be classified as true waste.
Typically 95% of the fuel is made up of uranium, which contains still around 1% of fissile isotope 235, more than natural uranium. The spent fuel contains also a further 1% of plutonium, whose 70% of isotopes are fissile and can produce energy. This uranium can be re-enriched and the plutonium recycled to enter in the composition of fresh fuels to power another reactors. The remaining 4% of the spent fuel are made of fission products and minor actinides. They accounts for almost 98% of its beta and gamma radioactivity. These are the true waste products.
This waste is highly radioactive, but it is onditioned by being embedded in glasses or ceramics which offer less long-term hazards for the environment than the disposal ‘in-state' of spent fuel without reprocessing. The final disposal of these vitrified waste has yet to be decided, but their mass being much smaller than the spent fuel, their stockpiling in interim storage facilities is less a problem.
Access to page in french.