EN | FR

# Dose Factors

## What doses for swallowing or inhaling radioactive atoms ?

How to evaluate the doses resulting from ingestion or inhalation of radioactive substances ? How to translate activities measured by detectors - but difficult to understand - to effective doses that are of concern for the man in the street? In other words, how to convert becquerels into millisieverts ?

From activities to committed doses ...
Example of committed doses due to the ingestion of contaminated food near Chernobyl. The curves show the evolution of the activity of iodine 131 and cesium 137, during the three months following the accident, one kilogram of meat or salad and a litre of milk coming from the most contaminated areas. Activities were considered at their maximum and the maximum doses were obtained by multiplying these activities by the factors of doses of iodine 131 and caesium 137. In the most hazardous case of the salads, the ingestion of 5.6 kBq resulted in a dose of 0.125 mSv, equivalent to 15 days of exposure to natural radioactivity in France.
IRSN

When radioactive atoms are ingested, the resulting effective dose is calculated through ‘dose conversion factor. A dose factor per ingestion is considered for each radioactive species ingested. Dose factors allows to compare the nocivity of radioactive elements (radioelements), for an equal ingested activity.

The effective dose resulting from the ingestion of a certain amount of a radioactive substance would be calculated from the radioactive activities of the radioelements contained therein. For each radioelement involved, its dose factor is first multiplied by the activity (number of becquerels) ingested. Then, the effective dose is obtained by summing all the radioelements involved.

There are also tables of inhalation dose factors, whose use is less straightforward because these factors depend on the size of the aerosols which carry the radioactive atoms.

The relevant effective dose obtained is a committed dose, i.e. a dose evaluated for a person’s lifetime. This evaluation depends on the method of ingestion and the path taken by the radiation through a person’s body.

One calculates "equivalent" and "effective" committed doses resulting from ingestion or inhalation of a radioactive substance. One has to estimate, nearly on the scale of a human life, the final dose that will be suffered by a tissue (or organ) or by the whole body. The assumed time span is 50 years for adults and 70 years for children in order to reflect the phasing out of radioactive substances or their non-elimination for some of them.

Alpha emitters (such as uranium, plutonium, and the actinides produced by nuclear reactors) are far more dangerous in this regard than beta emitters (such as the products of nuclear fission). We can also see that the inhalation of alpha emitters (and their consequent presence in the lungs) is several tens of times more hazardous than their ingestion.

The paths of radioelements in the human body differ according to their chemical properties. Radioactive atoms will undergo the same metabolic processes as their neighbours in the periodic table. This is why radium can be found alongside calcium in the bones, and why iodine-131 as well as its stable isotope both target the thyroid gland.

The thyroid gland plays a particularly important role before adulthood, and as a result children and adolescents are far more sensitive than adults to radioactive iodine 131. A toddler will be over ten times more sensitive to radioactive iodine that makes its way to the thyroid.

Table of dose factors
This table of dose factors for ingestion and inhalation shows some significant variations across the elements. As all the dose factors expressed in Sv/Bq are very small, they have been given mSv/kBq - equivalent to a millionth of a Sv/Bq. The beta emitters (tritium, fission products etc.) are displayed on a blue background. One can remark the much higher radiotoxicities associated with alpha emitters, especially when it comes to inhalation. When radioactive descendants are relevant, the symbol (*) indicates that they are taken into account in calculating the committed doses.
@ Source: Annexe du Rapport CNE 2003

In order to evaluate dose factors the most accurately possible, radiobiologists use models which take into account the type and strength of radiation involved, as well as the way in which energy is deposited in the body and the age of the recipient. These models, though inevitably imperfect, make use of the most up-to-date research in the field.

Doses factors tables are then published and updated annually to include the more recent data. One may An example of these tables can be found in the publication 119 of the ICRP (Annexes F and G, pages 71 and 87)

The values of dose factors, which convert ‘activities’ in becquerels to ‘doses’ in sieverts, are very tiny because the Sievert (Sv) is a large unit and the Becquerel(Bq) a very small one. The largest dose factors of heavy elements such as plutonium are around one ten-millionth of Bq/Sv, whereas light elements such as tritiated water have much smaller factors of closer to one hundred-billionth Bq/Sv.